Few crimes attract as much scrutiny, enforcement efforts and prosecutions by the federal government as money laundering does. And the very nature of money laundering – concealing the source of ill-gotten funds through myriad financial tricks and transactions – makes it one of the more challenging crimes to uncover. That’s why law enforcement often relies on courageous whistleblowers to report and expose such activity. Now, under recently passed federal legislation, those who blow the whistle on money laundering stand a greater chance of receiving compensation for their efforts if they lead to the recovery of ill-gotten funds.

Signed into law as part of the omnibus spending bill in December 2022, the federal Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Whistleblower Improvement Act expands whistleblower rewards and strengthens protections under a previously established AML Whistleblower Program overseen by the U.S. Treasury Department. That program was riddled with loopholes and exceptions that limited its effectiveness and undermined the incentive for whistleblowers to come forward.

Guaranteed Minimum Award for Eligible AML Whistleblowers

As with many, but not all, whistleblower programs, the AML Whistleblower Program offered the promise of financial rewards to individuals who provided information about money laundering activities. But unlike other programs, the AML program didn’t guarantee a minimum amount of compensation for whistleblowers.

For example, the Security and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) program provides that eligible whistleblowers receive 10-30% of the amounts recovered. The AML program, on the other hand, contained no such guarantee. Rather, it only put a limit (30%) on the amount of money a whistleblower could obtain. This meant that an individual whose actions resulted in the federal government’s recovery of tens of millions of dollars could wind up receiving $1 for their efforts – or nothing at all. This toothless reward program hardly made it worth the risk for whistleblowers who put their careers, livelihoods and reputations on the line by reporting illegal activities. Indeed, few whistleblowers came forward under the program, and not a single reward was given during the two years of its existence.

The AML Whistleblower Improvement Act remedies this deficiency by guaranteeing that a qualifying whistleblower receive “not less than 10 percent” of amounts recovered or collected in a government enforcement action. The act also establishes a self-sustaining fund for whistleblower awards financed by the amounts collected in whistleblower-assisted money laundering cases. Previously, the law contained no mechanism for funding the program.

AML Expanded to Include Whistleblowers Who Report Sanctions Violations

The act also expands the AML program to include violations of U.S. sanctions laws such as those imposed on Russian oligarchs after that country’s invasion of Ukraine. This means that rewards and protections are now available to whistleblowers who report this type of illegal conduct.

Protections Against Retaliation

The new and prior AML whistleblower laws protect whistleblowers against retaliation by their employers for reporting illegal activities or otherwise assisting the government in its anti-money laundering efforts. A victim of prohibited retaliation can seek back pay, reinstatement or front pay, compensatory damages and other remedies from their employer.

If you feel you’ve experienced illegal action in your workplace, we encourage you to submit a Case Review Form to our firm. One of our attorneys will review your information, and you’ll receive a response from our firm in a timely manner. There is no charge for this confidential process. And, if we take your case, as a contingency-based law firm, there is no cost unless we win.

We’re here to help you navigate your lawful rights and ensure you get the treatment you deserve. Together, we can hold employers accountable and create a fairer workplace for everyone.

Whistleblowers who call out bribery of foreign officials can reap significant rewards

Never underestimate human creativity when unchecked greed is involved. People who feel unbound by such trifles as ethics, morals, fair play – or the law – will find a way to get what they want. They’ll bend and break the rules in new and creative ways, illegally game the system through novel schemes and take advantage of the complexities of business and the law to wrongfully obtain the money, favors, benefits, information or things of value they covet. Sometimes, however, such corruption involves a more straightforward act: bribery. And bribery is one of many wrongful acts that can form the basis of a whistleblower action.

An Ancient Tradition and a Modern Scourge

Bribery is one of the oldest forms of corruption. In fact, it’s literally the textbook definition of corruption, as the Oxford Dictionary defines it as “dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, typically involving bribery.” Acts of bribery can be found in the historical records of ancient Egypt, Greece and China, among other civilizations. Today, bribery is a persistent pox on the global economy, but on a scope and scale that corrupt officials of the ancient world couldn’t conceive.

The World Bank estimates international bribery exceeds $1.5 trillion annually, or 2% of global gross domestic product. High-ranking officials around the world, including presidents and prime ministers, are regularly embroiled in headline-making bribery scandals. And here in the U.S., bribery cases involving public and elected officials, from zoning board and city council members to law enforcement agents to members of Congress, result in hundreds of prosecutions and convictions each year. Between 2017 and 2021, 987 people were convicted of federal bribery charges, according to the U.S.
Sentencing Commission.

Laws Reward and Protect Whistleblowers Who Expose Bribery and Corruption

Most bribery schemes are simple; the complexities usually involve a cover-up. A person or organization wants something from a public official that may not be obtainable by legal means – a permit, a change in the law, a favorable decision, or, as is often the case, a lucrative government contract. To get the desired outcome, the bribing party will give the official an off-the-books reward – a suitcase full of cash or laundered money, luxury cars or vacations, a promise of a “consulting” job or anything else the official desires.

Several federal and state criminal laws prohibit bribery. The primary federal bribery statute involving U.S. officials prohibits giving or accepting anything of value to or by a public official if the thing is given “with intent to influence” an official act, or if the official receives it “in return for being influenced.”

As with commerce, however, bribery doesn’t have borders in this age of globalization. For U.S. citizens and companies that do business in other countries, where public corruption is widespread, offering bribes can be the cheapest and fastest way to get the government accommodations they want for their business objectives. Federal law bans such bribes as well. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) generally prohibits the payment of bribes to foreign officials to assist in obtaining or retaining business. 

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Justice enforce the FCPA’s anti-bribery provisions. The SEC may bring civil enforcement actions against companies and individuals that violate those provisions. Those that are found in violation of the act are subject to substantial fines as well as the forfeiture of any benefits they received because of the violation. 

As noted, many acts of bribery go undetected because both parties will make great efforts to conceal their conduct. That’s one reason the SEC relies on whistleblowers to report violations of the FCPA, among other laws. Those who report bribery and other misconduct through the SEC whistleblower program are often employees of the companies involved. Employees receive protection from retaliation. If a company fires or takes other adverse employment action against a whistleblower, the employee can sue in federal court and seek double back pay (with interest), reinstatement, reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs.

Just as important, an FCPA whistleblower can receive a percentage of any amounts the government recovers as a result of the information provided. These sums can be significant. For example, in fiscal year 2021 alone, 108 whistleblowers received $564 million in awards through the SEC program. That’s an average of $5.2 million per whistleblower.

If you’re aware of or suspect bribery or other illegal conduct by your employer or individuals at your company and are ready to share what you know, the whistleblower attorneys at Halunen Law stand ready to support you. We’ve recovered millions of dollars in compensation for individuals who had the courage to do the right thing. During a free, confidential consultation, our whistleblower lawyers can answer your questions and help determine if you have grounds to pursue a claim. Contact our firm at 612-605-4098 or submit this Contact Form online.

susan m coler employment attorneyA Partner at Halunen Law, Susan Coler is a member of the Halunen Law False Claims Act (FCA)/Whistleblower Practice Group. She represents whistleblowers who challenge illegal corporate conduct, particularly fraud against the government. As an MSBA Labor and Employment Law Specialist, Susan has also brought successful retaliation claims in connection with FCA/qui tam cases and as stand-alone actions

You’ve likely heard some variation of the adage, “If the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.” When we meet people who’ve experienced workplace harassment, discrimination, retaliation, or wrongful termination, many of them arrive believing the only tool that can obtain justice is the hammer of litigation. Many more victims of wrongful employment actions never contact a lawyer because they mistakenly assume that hiring one means a lawsuit is inevitable.

The reality is that wronged employees have plenty of tools other than litigation if they want to hold their employers accountable for the financial, emotional, reputational, and other damages they caused. If aversion to a lawsuit is holding you back from arranging a free consultation with one of our employment attorneys, please understand that all roads to justice don’t lead to the courthouse.

Litigation Is Rarely the First Option

Not only is litigation far from the only option for resolving an employment dispute, it is also rarely the first option. Most lawsuits aim to resolve conflicts or hold parties responsible for their wrongful actions through settlements or after trials. But most lawsuits (other than when immediate intervention is required to protect or preserve a party’s rights) proceed only after other efforts to resolve conflicts fail. 

That’s because litigation – while sometimes necessary – can be lengthy, costly, and emotionally taxing. It also involves significant uncertainty, as there’s no such thing as a “slam-dunk” case, no matter how egregious the underlying conduct may have been. Significantly, litigation is a public process. What was a private dispute is now out in the open. 

If all other attempts to resolve your employment dispute fail, litigation – despite its less- than-appealing qualities – may be the only way to vindicate your rights and obtain the relief, remedies, and compensation you deserve. And if you reach the courthouse steps, you will not be alone because your attorney will be in your corner all the way. But before reaching the courthouse steps, your attorney will undoubtedly explore all other options for achieving your goals.

Leverage Can Deter Litigation

These options begin with negotiations with your current or former employer. After you’ve determined your goals – getting your job back, back pay, front pay, an apology or admission of wrongdoing – your attorney can develop and implement a strategy to exert maximum leverage over the employer when negotiating the terms of a severance or settlement. And if you have potential or viable claims against your employer for discrimination, harassment, retaliation, or wrongful termination, you have plenty of leverage.

No business wants the uncertainty, disruption and potential financial or reputational damage that are byproducts of employment litigation. Employers value avoiding such unattractive consequences. If an employer worries that you may have viable claims, offering you an attractive severance package or agreeing to other settlement demands in exchange for claim waivers can be a wise investment. Similarly, your employer may want to ensure that you refrain from publicizing your allegations and compensate you for keeping them confidential. 

Given these circumstances, there’s a significant chance you’ll be able to obtain the justice you seek through negotiation rather than litigation. And even if you fail to resolve your claims before you file a lawsuit, your case can settle at any time, even after a trial starts.

Meeting With a Lawyer Doesn’t Mean You’ll Become a Litigant

No matter how righteously indignant you are about the way your employer treated you and no matter how strong your claims may be, the thought of lawsuits and courtrooms, of questions from a hostile attorney about your already traumatic experience, of unwanted attention or publicity, may deter you from entertaining the thought of meeting a lawyer. But this can be a costly mistake; one that deprives you of an opportunity to obtain justice and vindication without litigation. As non-litigious as you may be, remember that meeting with a lawyer doesn’t mean that you’ll become a litigant.

If you feel you’ve experienced illegal action in your workplace, we encourage you to submit a Case Review Form to our firm. One of our attorneys will review your information, and you’ll receive a response from our firm in a timely manner. There is no charge for this confidential process. And, if we take your case, as a contingency-based law firm, there is no cost unless we win.

We’re here to help you navigate your lawful rights and ensure you get the treatment you deserve. Together, we can hold employers accountable and create a fairer workplace for everyone.

DashboardsThe federal government has several whistleblower programs that encourage, protect, and reward individuals for reporting fraudulent or illegal conduct. Few such efforts have been as successful and put more money in whistleblowers’ pockets as has the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) whistleblower program

The SEC reports that since the whistleblower program’s inception, it has awarded more than $1.1 billion to 214 people for providing information that led to successful enforcement actions involving securities fraud and other violations of the law. The SEC also reported that it made more whistleblower awards in fiscal year 2021 than in all previous years combined. Now, a rare piece of bipartisan legislation would further strengthen this program and provide more robust incentives and protections for those who report misconduct in the securities industry.

Introduced on March 31, 2022, by U.S. Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), the SEC Whistleblower Reform Act of 2022 would speed up the claims process and implement new measures to prevent retaliation against whistleblowers.

What is the SEC Whistleblower Program?

Established by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, the SEC whistleblower program provides a mechanism for individuals to give the government information about alleged acts of securities fraud. While whistleblowers are often employees of the company engaging in fraudulent conduct, anyone who reports past or ongoing violations of federal securities laws or regulations can use the program. 

If the information provided to the SEC results in a successful enforcement action, the whistleblower could receive a percentage of the ill-gotten gains recovered by the government. These sums can be significant. For example, in fiscal year 2021 alone, 108 whistleblowers received $564 million in awards through the SEC program. That’s an average of $5.2 million per whistleblower.

Recognizing that those courageous enough to report misconduct in the securities industry often do so at great risk to their careers and livelihoods, the SEC program prohibits retaliation to provide protection for whistleblowing employees. Victims of such retaliation can sue their employers in federal court and seek double back pay (with interest), reinstatement, reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs.

How the Bill Would Increase Protection for SEC Whistleblowers

While the SEC whistleblower program is unquestionably successful, it’s not perfect. The proposed legislation focuses on two of the program’s biggest deficiencies: the time it takes for the SEC to process and disburse whistleblower awards and loopholes that expose employees to potential retaliation before they report misconduct to the SEC.

Some whistleblowers, many of whom were terminated because of their efforts, must wait up to four years for compensation. The bill would reduce the wait time by requiring the SEC to issue an initial ruling on a claim within one year of the claim filing deadline.

Additionally, SEC whistleblowers are only protected from retaliation if they provide information to the SEC or other select officials. This means that an employee who reports malfeasance internally and is then fired has no legal remedy under the current SEC whistleblower statute. The proposed bill would extend SEC whistleblower protections to those who face retaliation for reporting misconduct to a supervisor or other person they believe has the authority to address the misconduct. The bill would also clarify that employees can’t waive their whistleblower rights through pre-dispute arbitration agreements.

Halunen Law: SEC Whistleblower Attorneys

At Halunen Law, we have the utmost respect for whistleblowers. While the fate of the SEC Whistleblower Reform Act is uncertain, our SEC whistleblower attorneys continue to fiercely protect the rights of those who report misconduct in the securities industry and fight to get them the maximum amount of compensation available for their courageous efforts. If you need assistance or have questions about pursuing an SEC whistleblower claim, please contact Halunen Law or call us at (612) 605-4098 for a free consultation.

Halunen-Law-Content-Optimization-SEC-Whistleblower-blog-July-2022-Google-Docs

Three twenty dollar bills resting in a restaurant bill folder. In Minnesota, the answer is, “No, not if you don’t want to.” Your tips are your tips.

For decades, it has been the law in Minnesota that an employer cannot require an employee to pool (i.e., share) their tips with other employees or the employer (including management).[1] In fact, an employer cannot play any role in that decision.[2] An employer can’t refuse to hire someone or threaten to fire someone if they refuse to participate in the pool.

Employers can do a few things, including safeguarding and distributing the tips, as well as recording them for tax purposes. But whether you share your tips is your decision.

In a similar vein, restaurants and other service industries will often add a “service charge” to a bill. Unless it is made clear to the customer that this charge is not a tip, that service charge belongs to the employee providing the service.[3] The employer cannot retain any portion of it.

There is an exception to all of this. If you provide service in a collaborative setting, such as a banquet, the tips may be pooled among those employees working that shift. But this is a limited exception, and under no circumstances can any of the money go to management or employees from other shifts.

If you are forced to pool your tips, reach out for a free consultation with an experienced employment attorney to see if your rights have been violated.

Employee rights and protections can be difficult to understand and navigate. If you believe you’ve experienced illegal activity in your workplace, you need an experienced legal team in your corner.  Halunen Law employment attorneys are deeply committed to fighting for employee rights and have an impressive record of getting results for those they represent. We represent clients on a contingency basis, so there is no cost unless we win. Contact our office today for a free, confidential consultation.

 

[1] Minn. Stat. § 177.24, subd. 3.

[2] Burt v. Rackner, 902 N.W.2d 448 (Minn. 2017)

[3] Minn. R. 5200.0080

truck driver pay lawsEmployee misclassification has become a huge problem in the United States. Employers who want to increase profits by not paying withholding and other taxes and escaping liability for workers’ compensation and unemployment claims will often claim that their workers are ‘independent contractors’ or ‘consultants’ (ICs), even though these people perform jobs that go to the heart of the employer’s business.

As an example, it has become almost automatic for operators of trucking, courier, and delivery services to use only independent contractor drivers. Why? The answer is simple- they save hundreds, maybe millions, of dollars each year by stiffing workers of benefits like 401(k) matches, insurance coverage, overtime, etc.

For many years now companies have largely gotten away with this intentional misclassification by requiring workers to sign agreements with arbitration clauses and class action waivers. When workers challenged misclassification they were required to do it individually, rather than as part of a larger group of workers, and had to submit their claim to an arbitrator rather than a judge (arbitrators often coming from the ranks of lawyers that defend corporations). As a result, it became almost impossible to succeed in these types of cases. However, the tide has finally turned.

Read More…

employers violate employee rightsAlthough Minnesota is an “employment at-will” state—meaning the employer may terminate an employee at any time for any reason—there are, in fact, exceptions to the rule. Since 1967 the Minnesota Human Rights Act has served as the State’s comprehensive employment rights law and provides a wide range of protections for employees. Yet even with the law in place, employers continue to violate employees’ rights in countless ways. Here are 20 of the most common violations for which an employee may seek monetary relief under the Minnesota Human Rights Act:

Read More…

A woman in a black and white striped shirt looks down while holding out her hand with her palm outward in a gesture of "stop."The #MeToo movement has shined light on sexual harassment and sexual assault in the workplace and work-related events. However, there is still a value in increasing knowledge, training, and education when it comes to sexual harassment and sexual assault in the workplace.

In light of this, it’s vital that employees take the time to understand what sexual harassment and sexual assault are in the workplace, and how certain employment situations may make them more vulnerable than others. As an employee, it is important to know that such misconduct can happen to anyone, and if it happens to you, you are not alone – we are here to help.

Read More…

A digital illustration of a red whistle with the silhouette of a face in the bowl of the whistle. A few years back, a news article reported that a meeting of corporate defense attorneys had called out whistleblowers as primarily “disgruntled employees.” This remark reflects a too-common perspective that whistleblowers are a nuisance rather than a contributor to the well-being of our businesses and our government. Far from being a nuisance, whistleblowers are champions of ethical conduct and play a powerful role in prodding businesses to do what is right. Are whistleblowers often disgruntled employees?  Of course. Read More…

Portrait of three diverse women who are staring at the camera, serious and confident. As an immigrant from Bangladesh, Eva Biswas was granted asylum in the United States to escape the persecution, terrorism, and sexual violence she experienced in her home country. But she found life in her new country brought unexpected challenges in the form of the alleged sexual harassment from her workplace supervisor at a national chain store. In her lawsuit, Ms. Biswas alleges her store manager propositioned her for sexual favors in exchange for a promotion. She claims that she told the other managers at her store what happened, but was told to keep it to herself and that she had “misunderstood” what her manager did because she didn’t understand American culture.

Read More…

© 2026 Halunen Law | Minneapolis Employment Attorneys