Few crimes attract as much scrutiny, enforcement efforts and prosecutions by the federal government as money laundering does. And the very nature of money laundering – concealing the source of ill-gotten funds through myriad financial tricks and transactions – makes it one of the more challenging crimes to uncover. That’s why law enforcement often relies on courageous whistleblowers to report and expose such activity. Now, under recently passed federal legislation, those who blow the whistle on money laundering stand a greater chance of receiving compensation for their efforts if they lead to the recovery of ill-gotten funds.
Signed into law as part of the omnibus spending bill in December 2022, the federal Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Whistleblower Improvement Act expands whistleblower rewards and strengthens protections under a previously established AML Whistleblower Program overseen by the U.S. Treasury Department. That program was riddled with loopholes and exceptions that limited its effectiveness and undermined the incentive for whistleblowers to come forward.
Guaranteed Minimum Award for Eligible AML Whistleblowers
As with many, but not all, whistleblower programs, the AML Whistleblower Program offered the promise of financial rewards to individuals who provided information about money laundering activities. But unlike other programs, the AML program didn’t guarantee a minimum amount of compensation for whistleblowers.
For example, the Security and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) program provides that eligible whistleblowers receive 10-30% of the amounts recovered. The AML program, on the other hand, contained no such guarantee. Rather, it only put a limit (30%) on the amount of money a whistleblower could obtain. This meant that an individual whose actions resulted in the federal government’s recovery of tens of millions of dollars could wind up receiving $1 for their efforts – or nothing at all. This toothless reward program hardly made it worth the risk for whistleblowers who put their careers, livelihoods and reputations on the line by reporting illegal activities. Indeed, few whistleblowers came forward under the program, and not a single reward was given during the two years of its existence.
The AML Whistleblower Improvement Act remedies this deficiency by guaranteeing that a qualifying whistleblower receive “not less than 10 percent” of amounts recovered or collected in a government enforcement action. The act also establishes a self-sustaining fund for whistleblower awards financed by the amounts collected in whistleblower-assisted money laundering cases. Previously, the law contained no mechanism for funding the program.
AML Expanded to Include Whistleblowers Who Report Sanctions Violations
The act also expands the AML program to include violations of U.S. sanctions laws such as those imposed on Russian oligarchs after that country’s invasion of Ukraine. This means that rewards and protections are now available to whistleblowers who report this type of illegal conduct.
Protections Against Retaliation
The new and prior AML whistleblower laws protect whistleblowers against retaliation by their employers for reporting illegal activities or otherwise assisting the government in its anti-money laundering efforts. A victim of prohibited retaliation can seek back pay, reinstatement or front pay, compensatory damages and other remedies from their employer.
If you feel you’ve experienced illegal action in your workplace, we encourage you to submit a Case Review Form to our firm. One of our attorneys will review your information, and you’ll receive a response from our firm in a timely manner. There is no charge for this confidential process. And, if we take your case, as a contingency-based law firm, there is no cost unless we win.
We’re here to help you navigate your lawful rights and ensure you get the treatment you deserve. Together, we can hold employers accountable and create a fairer workplace for everyone.
A Partner at Halunen Law, 

In Minnesota, the answer is, “No, not if you don’t want to.” Your tips are your tips.
Employee misclassification has become a huge problem in the United States. Employers who want to increase profits by not paying withholding and other taxes and escaping liability for workers’ compensation and unemployment claims will often claim that their workers are ‘independent contractors’ or ‘consultants’ (ICs), even though these people perform jobs that go to the heart of the employer’s business.
Although Minnesota is an “employment at-will” state—meaning the employer may terminate an employee at any time for any reason—there are, in fact, exceptions to the rule. Since 1967 the Minnesota Human Rights Act has served as the State’s comprehensive employment rights law and provides a wide range of protections for employees. Yet even with the law in place, employers continue to violate employees’ rights in countless ways. Here are 20 of the most common violations for which an employee may seek monetary relief under the Minnesota Human Rights Act:
The #MeToo movement has shined light on sexual harassment and sexual assault in the workplace and work-related events. However, there is still a value in increasing knowledge, training, and education when it comes to sexual harassment and sexual assault in the workplace.
A few years back, a news article reported that a meeting of corporate defense attorneys had called out whistleblowers as primarily “disgruntled employees.” This remark reflects a too-common perspective that whistleblowers are a nuisance rather than a contributor to the well-being of our businesses and our government. Far from being a nuisance, whistleblowers are champions of ethical conduct and play a powerful role in prodding businesses to do what is right. Are whistleblowers often disgruntled employees? Of course.
As an immigrant from Bangladesh, Eva Biswas was granted asylum in the United States to escape the persecution, terrorism, and sexual violence she experienced in her home country. But she found life in her new country brought unexpected challenges in the form of the alleged