Legislation to Prohibit Arbitration Clauses from Denying Employees Their Day in Court

US-Senate-BuildingForced arbitration is a powerful tool used by employers to limit employees from suing them in court. Under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), employers have wide latitude to force employees into mandatory arbitration. Arbitration is a binding process that is conducted by a private judge (arbitrator),  instead of a public trial. Arbitration can have many disadvantages to employees as compared to court, including:

  • Shortened hearings with no formal rules of evidence
  • Very limited ability to obtain documents and information from the employer before the hearing
  • Not public
  • Extremely limited appeal rights

Because employers often condition employment offers on signing an arbitration agreement, employees often do not truly have a choice whether to sign away their right to go to court should they decide sue their employer. The FAA has been broadly interpreted and reinforced by the United States Supreme Court in the past few decades, effectively denying employees their constitutional right to have their case heard in court.[1]

To combat forced arbitration the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Fair Arbitration Injustice Repeal (“FAIR” Act) in 2019. The FAIR Act would repeal the FAA, finally allowing employees to have their day in court. But the FAIR Act was never brought to the floor in the Republican-controlled Senate, and therefore didn’t become law.

On February 11, 2021, the FAIR Act was re-introduced to the House of Representatives (H.R. 963) by Representative Hank Johnson (D-GA). The FAIR Act is expected to pass the House again this year. Since Democrats now (narrowly) control the Senate, the FAIR Act is likely to make it out of committee in the Senate, and go to a full floor vote.

However, it is unclear whether the FAIR Act will garner enough Republican support in the Senate to overcome the filibuster, which remains in place, though the prohibition of forced arbitration in employment matters has received bipartisan support in the past.[2]

If you support ending forced arbitration, please contact your elected representative and encourage them to vote yes on the FAIR Act (H.R. 963): https://www.usa.gov/elected-officials.

Halunen Law supports the rights of employees to have full and free access to the court system. If you are subject to a forced arbitration agreement and feel you are being treated illegally in the workplace, the experienced employment law attorneys at Halunen Law are here to help. Contact us today for a free consultation.

[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/seventh_amendment

[2] https://endforcedarbitration.medium.com/the-bipartisan-case-for-ending-forced-arbitration-485f73eeb635

Other Recent Posts

Ensuring Our Clients’ Voices Are Heard: A Report of Halunen Law’s Work...

Posted on February 17th, 2026

Halunen Law reports that the Firm’s representation of employees and whistleblowers in 2025 produced results ...

Read More →
Jackie Olsen
Attorney Jacqueline A. Olson joins Halunen Law Employment Litigation Group

Posted on December 30th, 2025

  MINNEAPOLIS, MN: Halunen Law is pleased to announce that attorney Jacqueline (Jackie) A. Olson has ...

Read More →
GettyImages-524176874 (1)
Understanding Your Legal Rights After Experiencing Sexual Harassment or Assault in the...

Posted on December 19th, 2025

Not long ago, it seemed there was constant news coverage of the #MeToo movement. This ...

Read More →

All Posts

Explore all resources for trusted insights from the attorneys at Halunen Law.

EXPLORE ALL POSTS

Results That Make a Difference.

Our Practice Areas

LEARN MORE
© 2026 Halunen Law | Minneapolis Employment Attorneys