House of Representatives Passes Legislation Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination

Photo of the dome of the senate building from below framed in blue sky.Older workers are one significant step closer to enjoying the same federal protections as other protected classes after the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act (“POWADA”) on January 15, 2020. The Bill, if enacted, would amend the standard for employees alleging discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

In 2009, the United States Supreme Court decided in Gross v. FBL Financial Services, that in order for an employee to prove that an employer violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, an employee needed to show that he or she was terminated because of age.[1] Before Gross, age discrimination was treated just like discrimination based on other employee protected classes, such as race, color, sex, national origin, religion, or disability, which require an employee to prove that discrimination only played a role in the employer’s decision. POWADA would reverse the Gross decision and return older workers to the same playing field as other protected classes.

Although the Democratic House support was unanimous, it was the 34 Republican “yes” votes that gave some pundits hope for the Bill’s future in the Senate. Unfortunately, support for the Bill has stalled after simultaneous introduction in the U.S. Senate more than a year ago by a bipartisan group of Senators: (Bob Casey (D-PA), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Susan Collins (R-ME), and Patrick Leahy (D-VT).  Although the Bill was introduced to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions at the same time as it was in the House, the Bill has not been brought up for a vote or discussion in the Senate Committee by Chairman Lamar Alexander (R-TN).

Halunen Law encourages all concerned citizens to contact their Senators to voice their support on this important measure that strives to equal the playing field for our valuable older workers.

[1] Gross v. FBL Financial Services, 557 U.S. 167 (2009).

Other Recent Posts

Ensuring Our Clients’ Voices Are Heard: A Report of Halunen Law’s Work...

Posted on February 17th, 2026

Halunen Law reports that the Firm’s representation of employees and whistleblowers in 2025 produced results ...

Read More →
Jackie Olsen
Attorney Jacqueline A. Olson joins Halunen Law Employment Litigation Group

Posted on December 30th, 2025

  MINNEAPOLIS, MN: Halunen Law is pleased to announce that attorney Jacqueline (Jackie) A. Olson has ...

Read More →
GettyImages-524176874 (1)
Understanding Your Legal Rights After Experiencing Sexual Harassment or Assault in the...

Posted on December 19th, 2025

Not long ago, it seemed there was constant news coverage of the #MeToo movement. This ...

Read More →

All Posts

Explore all resources for trusted insights from the attorneys at Halunen Law.

EXPLORE ALL POSTS

Results That Make a Difference.

Our Practice Areas

LEARN MORE
© 2026 Halunen Law | Minneapolis Employment Attorneys